Monday, February 4, 2008

Clinton would garnish wages to pay for health care

Just one more story that illustrates the Dem. perspective that big government knows the best way to spend YOUR paycheck.

By CHARLES BABINGTON, Associated Press Writer
Sun Feb 3, 11:40 AM ET


WASHINGTON - Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans.

The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC's "This Week," she said: "I think there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going after people's wages, automatic enrollment."

Clinton said such measures would apply only to workers who can afford health coverage but refuse to buy it, which puts undue pressure on hospitals and emergency rooms. With her proposals for subsidies, she said, "it will be affordable for everyone."

Clinton also suggested that Obama would be more susceptible to Republican attack ads in a general election because he has not been scrutinized for years as she has.

"I've been through the Republican attacks over and over again," she said. When Obama was elected to the Senate from Illinois in 2004, she said, he "didn't face anyone who ran attack ads" comparable to those aimed at her.

The presidential contenders in both parties campaigned all-out on Sunday, two days before the Super Tuesday voting in 24 states holding primaries or caucuses.

Clinton was campaigning in Missouri and Minneapolis. Obama scheduled a rally in Wilmington, Del., while some of his highest-profile surrogates — his wife, Michelle, Oprah Winfrey and Caroline Kennedy — were rallying voters in Los Angeles. Among Republicans, Arizona Sen. John McCain was stumping in Connecticut and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney scheduled stops in Glen Ellyn, Ill., and the St. Louis suburb of Maryland Heights. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee was concentrating on the South, with appearances in Georgia and Tennessee.

McCain told "Fox News Sunday" he would veto any tax increase passed by a Democratic-controlled Congress. McCain, who opposed President Bush's first two tax cuts, now says Congress should make the reductions permanent, and that there also should be further tax reductions for business investments.

His chief rival, Romney, told the ABC program that McCain "doesn't understand the economy" and that his advocacy of a higher gasoline tax to combat global warming would hurt U.S. consumers.

2 comments:

SammyV said...

Its kind of nice to see that Ron Paul is still running, at least someone is speaking up for fiscal responsibility and smaller government. Jay, what do your fellow statesmen make of Obama? He seems popular here, but (though there are still several thousand votes to tally) California seems to have gone to Clinton. How do you compare his health care plan to hers?

Jay VanderLaan said...

Illinois is an extremely liberal state to begin with. Actually, Chicago is extremely liberal and large enough to tip the entire balance to the left on both state and national issues. All that to say that most people here are enamored of Obama. Having met him once I can also say he is a genuinely likable and polished man, but without much of a track record. I think it becomes easier to judge someone when there isn't much to judge. When it comes to health care, I do believe that his plan is more reasonable than Hillary's. Primarily because he says he will not MANDATE coverage (always nice to have some choice in a democracy). Also, we got a glimpse of Hillary's actual health care plan back in the 90's, and even her husband wouldn't back it because it was such an impractical mishmash. The fundamental flaw I see in any liberal stance on health care, however, is the inherent distrust of the free market, and the assumption that the government officials somehow posess all the answers (despite no experience or a track record of poor results).